在 2023/11/7 14:52, Yonghong Song 写道:
On 11/6/23 6:44 PM, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
Hello,
在 2023/11/7 02:29, Martin KaFai Lau 写道:
On 11/5/23 5:34 AM, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
BTF_TYPE_SAFE_TRUSTED(struct bpf_iter__task) in verifier.c wanted to
teach BPF verifier that bpf_iter__task -> task is a trusted ptr. But it
doesn't work well.
The reason is, bpf_iter__task -> task would go through btf_ctx_access()
which enforces the reg_type of 'task' is ctx_arg_info->reg_type, and in
task_iter.c, we actually explicitly declare that the
ctx_arg_info->reg_type is PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL.
This patch sets ctx_arg_info->reg_type is PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL |
PTR_TRUSTED in task_reg_info.
Similarly, bpf_cgroup_reg_info -> cgroup is also PTR_TRUSTED since
we are
under the protection of cgroup_mutex and we would check
cgroup_is_dead()
in __cgroup_iter_seq_show().
Make sense. I think the bpf_tcp_iter made similar change in
tcp_seq_info also. What may be the Fixes tag? Is it fixing the recent
kfunc of the css_task iter?
Thanks for the review.
I think it's not a fix for recent kfunc of css_task iter. We are
working at SEC("iter/task") and SEC("iter/cgroup").
I'm not sure whether it's a 'fix' for cgroup_iter/task_iter. If we
need fix tags, do we need to split this patch into two separate
patches? Or add two fix tags on commit log:
I think the patch itself is not a fix, rather an improvement. The
bpf_iter predates kfunc/PTR_TRUSTED stuff. The argument 'task'
or 'cgroup' are already trusted so the bpf_iter program can print out
useful data.
But recent kfunc things requires some parameters to be marked as
PTR_TRUSTED so that they can be passed to kfunc,
so this patch enables this usage for kfunc in bpf_iter programs.
Thanks. I will send v2.
