On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:19:32 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 09:38:50AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 18:34:09 -0500 > > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 18:33:01 -0500 > > > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > For x86_64, that would be: > > > > > > > > rdi, rsi, rdx, r8, r9, rsp > > > > > > I missed rcx. > > > > I would like to add rax to the list so that it can handle the return value too. :) > > So something like so? > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h > index 897cf02c20b1..71bfe27594a5 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h > @@ -36,6 +36,10 @@ static inline unsigned long ftrace_call_adjust(unsigned long addr) > > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS > struct ftrace_regs { > + /* > + * Partial, filled with: > + * rax, rcx, rdx, rdi, rsi, r8, r9, rsp Don't we need rbp too? (for frame pointer) > + */ > struct pt_regs regs; > }; -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>