Crossbuilding selftests/bpf for architecture arm64, format specifies type error show up like. xskxceiver.c:912:34: error: format specifies type 'int' but the argument has type '__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long') [-Werror,-Wformat] ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%d]\n", ~~ %llu __func__, pkt->pkt_nb, meta->count); ^~~~~~~~~~~ xskxceiver.c:929:55: error: format specifies type 'unsigned long long' but the argument has type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long') [-Werror,-Wformat] ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len); ~~~~ ^~~~ Fixing the issues by using the proposed format specifiers by the compilor. Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c index 591ca9637b23..dc03692f34d8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c @@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ static bool is_metadata_correct(struct pkt *pkt, void *buffer, u64 addr) struct xdp_info *meta = data - sizeof(struct xdp_info); if (meta->count != pkt->pkt_nb) { - ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%d]\n", + ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%llu]\n", __func__, pkt->pkt_nb, meta->count); return false; } @@ -926,11 +926,11 @@ static bool is_frag_valid(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, u64 addr, u32 len, u32 exp if (addr >= umem->num_frames * umem->frame_size || addr + len > umem->num_frames * umem->frame_size) { - ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len); + ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %lx len: %u\n", addr, len); return false; } if (!umem->unaligned_mode && addr % umem->frame_size + len > umem->frame_size) { - ksft_print_msg("Frag crosses frame boundary addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len); + ksft_print_msg("Frag crosses frame boundary addr: %lx len: %u\n", addr, len); return false; } @@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ static int complete_pkts(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, int batch_size) u64 addr = *xsk_ring_cons__comp_addr(&xsk->umem->cq, idx + rcvd - 1); ksft_print_msg("[%s] Too many packets completed\n", __func__); - ksft_print_msg("Last completion address: %llx\n", addr); + ksft_print_msg("Last completion address: %lx\n", addr); return TEST_FAILURE; } @@ -1513,7 +1513,7 @@ static int validate_tx_invalid_descs(struct ifobject *ifobject) } if (stats.tx_invalid_descs != ifobject->xsk->pkt_stream->nb_pkts / 2) { - ksft_print_msg("[%s] tx_invalid_descs incorrect. Got [%u] expected [%u]\n", + ksft_print_msg("[%s] tx_invalid_descs incorrect. Got [%llu] expected [%u]\n", __func__, stats.tx_invalid_descs, ifobject->xsk->pkt_stream->nb_pkts); return TEST_FAILURE; -- 2.42.0