Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 11/17] bpf: rename is_branch_taken reg arguments to prepare for the second one

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 11/17] bpf: rename is_branch_taken reg arguments to prepare for the second one
From: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 23:15:30 +0800
Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20231102033759.2541186-12-andrii@kernel.org>

On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 08:37:53PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Just taking mundane refactoring bits out into a separate patch. No
> functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@xxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v6 bpf-next 00/17] BPF register bounds logic and testing improvements
  - From: Andrii Nakryiko
- [PATCH v6 bpf-next 11/17] bpf: rename is_branch_taken reg arguments to prepare for the second one
  - From: Andrii Nakryiko

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 09/17] bpf: drop knowledge-losing __reg_combine_{32,64}_into_{64,32} logic
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 12/17] bpf: generalize is_branch_taken() to work with two registers
Previous by thread: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 11/17] bpf: rename is_branch_taken reg arguments to prepare for the second one
Next by thread: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 07/17] bpf: improve deduction of 64-bit bounds from 32-bit bounds
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux