Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 18:42:18 +0900
Cc: paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx, casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, song@xxxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, renauld@xxxxxxxxxx, pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20231102005521.346983-1-kpsingh@kernel.org>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

I didn't get your response on https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c588ca5d-c343-4ea2-a1f1-4efe67ebb8e3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx .

Do you agree that we cannot replace LKM-based LSMs with eBPF-based access control mechanisms,
and do you admit that this series makes LKM-based LSMs more difficult to use?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls
  - From: KP Singh

References:
- [PATCH v7 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls
  - From: KP Singh

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] tools/build: Add clang cross-compilation flags to feature detection
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] tools/build: Add clang cross-compilation flags to feature detection
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux