On 10/30/23 12:28 PM, thinker.li@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Changes from v5:
- As the 2nd patch, we introduce "bpf_struct_ops_desc". This change
involves moving certain members of "bpf_struct_ops" to
"bpf_struct_ops_desc", which becomes a part of
"btf_struct_ops_tab". This ensures that these members remain
accessible even when the owner module of a "bpf_struct_ops" is
unloaded.
- Correct the order of arguments when calling
in the 3rd patch.
- Remove the owner argument from bpf_struct_ops_init_one(). Instead,
callers should fill in st_ops->owner.
- Make sure to hold the owner module when calling
bpf_struct_ops_find() and bpf_struct_ops_find_value() in the 6th
patch.
- Merge the functions register_bpf_struct_ops_btf() and
register_bpf_struct_ops() into a single function and relocate it to
btf.c for better organization and clarity.
- Undo the name modifications made to find_kernel_btf_id() and
The find_kernel_attach_btf_id name change is still in patch 8. tbh, I don't have
a strong preference on the name here. Could it be in a separate patch for naming
cleanup or at least mention it in the commit message?
