Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next] bpf: Add __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 5:07 AM Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> BPF kfuncs are meant to be called from BPF programs. Accordingly, most
> kfuncs are not called from anywhere in the kernel, which the
> -Wmissing-prototypes warning is unhappy about. We've peppered
> __diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes", ... everywhere kfuncs are
> defined in the codebase to suppress this warning.
>
> This patch adds two macros meant to bound one or many kfunc definitions.
> All existing kfunc definitions which use these __diag calls to suppress
> -Wmissing-prototypes are migrated to use the newly-introduced macros.
> A new __diag_ignore_all - for "-Wmissing-declarations" - is added to the
> __bpf_kfunc_start_defs macro based on feedback from Andrii on an earlier
> version of this patch [0] and another recent mailing list thread [1].
>
> In the future we might need to ignore different warnings or do other
> kfunc-specific things. This change will make it easier to make such
> modifications for all kfunc defs.
>
>   [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzaE5dRWtK6RPLnjTW-MW9sx9K3Fn6uwqCTChK2Dcb1Xig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>   [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZT+2qCc%2FaXep0%2FLf@krava/
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@xxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> This patch was submitted earlier as part of task_vma
> iter series: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231013204426.1074286-6-davemarchevsky@xxxxxx/
>
> This separate submission addresses Andrii's comments from
> that thread.
>
>  include/linux/btf.h              |  9 +++++++++
>  kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c            |  6 ++----
>  kernel/bpf/cpumask.c             |  6 ++----
>  kernel/bpf/helpers.c             |  6 ++----
>  kernel/bpf/map_iter.c            |  6 ++----
>  kernel/bpf/task_iter.c           |  6 ++----
>  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c         |  6 ++----
>  net/bpf/test_run.c               |  7 +++----
>  net/core/filter.c                | 13 ++++---------
>  net/core/xdp.c                   |  6 ++----
>  net/ipv4/fou_bpf.c               |  6 ++----
>  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c |  6 ++----
>  net/netfilter/nf_nat_bpf.c       |  6 ++----
>  net/xfrm/xfrm_interface_bpf.c    |  6 ++----
>  14 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>

Thanks for your work.

By using a simple grep for "__diag_ignore_all(\"-Wmissing-prototypes",
it appears that the files net/socket.c,
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c,
kernel/cgroup/rstat.c and Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst are missing. It
seems that we should also update them.

-- 
Regards
Yafang





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux