Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 12/17] bpf: Fix race in btf_resolve_helper_id()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 9:48 PM Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> btf_resolve_helper_id() caching logic is racy, since under root the verifier
> can verify several programs in parallel. Fix it with extra spin_lock.
>
> Fixes: a7658e1a4164 ("bpf: Check types of arguments passed into helpers")
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h   |  3 ++-
>  kernel/bpf/btf.c      | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c |  6 +-----
>  3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>

[...]

> +       /* ok to race the search. The result is the same */
> +       ret = __btf_resolve_helper_id(log, fn->func, arg);
> +       if (!ret) {
> +               bpf_log(log, "BTF resolution bug\n");
> +               return -EFAULT;
> +       }
> +       spin_lock(&btf_resolve_lock);
> +       if (*btf_id) {
> +               ret = *btf_id;
> +               goto out;
> +       }
> +       *btf_id = ret;
> +out:
> +       spin_unlock(&btf_resolve_lock);

Is this race a problem? Does it cause any issues? Given that even if
you do parallel resolutions at the same time, they all will have to
result in the same btf_id, so just setting it unconditionally multiple
times without locking should be ok, no? Maybe WRITE_ONCE, but not sure
why all the way to spinlock.


> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int __get_type_size(struct btf *btf, u32 btf_id,
>                            const struct btf_type **bad_type)
>  {

[...]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux