Re: initiated discussion to support attribute address_space in clang

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/4/19 2:21 AM, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> 
> Hi Yonghong.
>      
>      I just initiated a discussion (RFC patch
>      https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D69393&d=DwIBAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=DA8e1B5r073vIqRrFz7MRA&m=HVZO3bIGjjwszfhtPMO7BxcQ8G3q0zl4YWBlkuNTwoE&s=3SzkSljEmvMMryd24w9UYZ3-Ws63XV8sEIWsgT_XDmI&e= ) for llvm/clang to support user
>      address_space attribute.
>      
>      I am not able to add your name in subscriber list as you probably
>      not registered with llvm mailing list or phabricator.
>      
>      Just let you know so we can have an eventual proposal which
>      will be also good for gcc. Please participate in discussion.
> 
> Thanks for reaching out, and sorry for the delay in replying: I needed
> some time to process my backlog after a couple of weeks off.
> 
> I just created an account in phabricator (jemarch).  Will follow up
> there.

Sounds good. Just let me know or comment on the patch if you have some 
ideas how things should be done in order for gcc to support the feature.

Thanks!

> 
> Salud!
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux