On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 20:46:29 +0200 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It's related to bpf-next, so only bpf-next is appropriate here. We'll > take it. OK, thanks! -- Steve
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 20:46:29 +0200 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It's related to bpf-next, so only bpf-next is appropriate here. We'll > take it. OK, thanks! -- Steve