On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:25:49PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 05:44:31AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > In v5.4-rc2 we added a new helper (cf. [1]) copy_struct_from_user(). > > This helper is intended for all codepaths that copy structs from > > userspace that are versioned by size. bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd() does > > exactly what copy_struct_from_user() is doing. > > Note that copy_struct_from_user() is calling min() already. So > > technically, the min_t() call could go. But the info_len is used further > > below so leave it. > > > > [1]: f5a1a536fa14 ("lib: introduce copy_struct_from_user() helper") > > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Acked-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > /* v1 */ > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191009160907.10981-3-christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > /* v2 */ > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191016004138.24845-3-christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx > > - Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > - remove unneeded initialization > > > > /* v3 */ > > unchanged > > --- > > kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 9 +++------ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c > > index 40edcaeccd71..151447f314ca 100644 > > --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c > > @@ -2306,20 +2306,17 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog, > > union bpf_attr __user *uattr) > > { > > struct bpf_prog_info __user *uinfo = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->info.info); > > - struct bpf_prog_info info = {}; > > + struct bpf_prog_info info; > > u32 info_len = attr->info.info_len; > > struct bpf_prog_stats stats; > > char __user *uinsns; > > u32 ulen; > > int err; > > > > - err = bpf_check_uarg_tail_zero(uinfo, sizeof(info), info_len); > > + info_len = min_t(u32, sizeof(info), info_len); > > + err = copy_struct_from_user(&info, sizeof(info), uinfo, info_len); > > really?! min?! > Frankly I'm disappointed in quality of these patches. > Especially considering it's v3. > > Just live the code alone. Oh, I didn't see that part. I didn't know that this would upset you that much. Sure, I can leave the code alone. Or I try to fix this up. If you're not happy with you can just ignore this. Christian