Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: allow __sk_buff tstamp in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/15, Martin Lau wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:31:24AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > It's useful for implementing EDT related tests (set tstamp, run the
> > test, see how the tstamp is changed or observe some other parameter).
> > 
> > Note that bpf_ktime_get_ns() helper is using monotonic clock, so for
> > the BPF programs that compare tstamp against it, tstamp should be
> > derived from clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, ...).
> Please provide a cover letter next time.  It makes ack-all possible.
SG, I'll try to add cover letter in the future if that helps.

If I remember correctly, acked-by to the cover letter was not
showing up in the patchwork and people usually do it for each patch
anyway. That's why I didn't bother to do it for this small change.

> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux