Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf, x86: Small optimization in comparing against imm0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 2:08 PM John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Song Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 5:30 PM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Replace 'cmp reg, 0' with 'test reg, reg' for comparisons against
> > > zero. Saves 1 byte of instruction encoding per occurrence. The flag
> > > results of test 'reg, reg' are identical to 'cmp reg, 0' in all
> > > cases except for AF which we don't use/care about. In terms of
> > > macro-fusibility in combination with a subsequent conditional jump
> > > instruction, both have the same properties for the jumps used in
> > > the JIT translation. For example, same JITed Cilium program can
> > > shrink a bit from e.g. 12,455 to 12,317 bytes as tests with 0 are
> > > used quite frequently.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>
>
> Bonus points for causing me to spend the morning remembering the
> differences between cmd, and, or, and test.
>
> Also wonder if at some point we should clean up the jit a bit and
> add some defines/helpers for all the open coded opcodes and such.
>
> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>

Applied both. Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux