> On Sep 27, 2019, at 11:30 PM, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > This patch switches libbpf_num_possible_cpus() from using possible CPU > set to present CPU set. This fixes issues with incorrect auto-sizing of > PERF_EVENT_ARRAY map on HOTPLUG-enabled systems. > > On HOTPLUG enabled systems, /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible is going to > be a set of any representable (i.e., potentially possible) CPU, which is > normally way higher than real amount of CPUs (e.g., 0-127 on VM I've > tested on, while there were just two CPU cores actually present). > /sys/devices/system/cpu/present, on the other hand, will only contain > CPUs that are physically present in the system (even if not online yet), > which is what we really want, especially when creating per-CPU maps or > perf events. > > On systems with HOTPLUG disabled, present and possible are identical, so > there is no change of behavior there. > > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx> > --- > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > index e0276520171b..45351c074e45 100644 > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > @@ -5899,7 +5899,7 @@ void bpf_program__bpil_offs_to_addr(struct bpf_prog_info_linear *info_linear) > > int libbpf_num_possible_cpus(void) > { > - static const char *fcpu = "/sys/devices/system/cpu/possible"; > + static const char *fcpu = "/sys/devices/system/cpu/present"; This is _very_ confusing. "possible cpus", "present cpus", and "online cpus" are existing terminologies. I don't think we should force people to remember something like "By possible cpus, libbpf actually means present cpus". This change works if we call it "libbbpf_num_cpus()". However, libbpf_num_possible_cpus(), should mean possible CPUs. Thanks, Song