Re: Linux 5.4 - bpf test build fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 9/24/19 8:26 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Hi Alexei and Daniel,
> 
> bpf test doesn't build on Linux 5.4 mainline. Do you know what's
> happening here.
> 
> 
> make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
> 
> -c progs/test_core_reloc_ptr_as_arr.c -o - || echo "clang failed") | \
> llc -march=bpf -mcpu=generic  -filetype=obj -o 
> /mnt/data/lkml/linux_5.4/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_core_reloc_ptr_as_arr.o 
> 
> progs/test_core_reloc_ptr_as_arr.c:25:6: error: use of unknown builtin
>        '__builtin_preserve_access_index' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>          if (BPF_CORE_READ(&out->a, &in[2].a))
>              ^
> ./bpf_helpers.h:533:10: note: expanded from macro 'BPF_CORE_READ'
>                         __builtin_preserve_access_index(src))
>                         ^
> progs/test_core_reloc_ptr_as_arr.c:25:6: warning: incompatible integer to
>        pointer conversion passing 'int' to parameter of type 'const void *'
>        [-Wint-conversion]
>          if (BPF_CORE_READ(&out->a, &in[2].a))
>              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./bpf_helpers.h:533:10: note: expanded from macro 'BPF_CORE_READ'
>                         __builtin_preserve_access_index(src))
>                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 1 warning and 1 error generated.
> llc: error: llc: <stdin>:1:1: error: expected top-level entity
> clang failed
> 
> Also
> 
> make TARGETS=bpf kselftest fails as well. Dependency between
> tools/lib/bpf and the test. How can we avoid this type of
> dependency or resolve it in a way it doesn't result in build
> failures?

Thanks, Shuah.

The clang __builtin_preserve_access_index() intrinsic is
introduced in LLVM9 (which just released last week) and
the builtin and other CO-RE features are only supported
in LLVM10 (current development branch) with more bug fixes
and added features.

I think we should do a feature test for llvm version and only
enable these tests when llvm version >= 10.

Andrii, what do you think?

> 
> thanks,
> -- Shuah




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux