Re: [PATCH] bpf: validate bpf_func when BPF_JIT is enabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2019-09-11 09:42, Yonghong Song wrote:
I am not an expert in XDP testing. Toke, Björn, could you give some
suggestions what to test for XDP performance here?

I ran the "xdp_rxq_info" sample with and without Sami's patch:

$ sudo ./xdp_rxq_info --dev enp134s0f0 --action XDP_DROP

Before:

Running XDP on dev:enp134s0f0 (ifindex:6) action:XDP_DROP options:no_touch
XDP stats       CPU     pps         issue-pps
XDP-RX CPU      20      23923874    0
XDP-RX CPU      total   23923874

RXQ stats       RXQ:CPU pps         issue-pps
rx_queue_index   20:20  23923878    0
rx_queue_index   20:sum 23923878

After Sami's patch:

Running XDP on dev:enp134s0f0 (ifindex:6) action:XDP_DROP options:no_touch
XDP stats       CPU     pps         issue-pps
XDP-RX CPU      20      22998700    0
XDP-RX CPU      total   22998700

RXQ stats       RXQ:CPU pps         issue-pps
rx_queue_index   20:20  22998705    0
rx_queue_index   20:sum 22998705


So, roughly ~4% for this somewhat naive scenario.


As for XDP performance tests; I guess some of the XDP selftests could be
used as well!


Björn



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux