Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: precision tracking tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: precision tracking tests
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 15:13:42 +0200
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20190903225133.821243-1-ast@kernel.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2

On 9/4/19 12:51 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:

Add two tests to check that stack slot marking during backtracking
doesn't trigger 'spi > allocated_stack' warning.
One test is using BPF_ST insn. Another is using BPF_STX.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>


Applied, thanks!

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: precision tracking tests
  - From: Alexei Starovoitov

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] ixgbe: fix xdp handle calculations
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] xsk: various CPU barrier and {READ, WRITE}_ONCE
Previous by thread: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: precision tracking tests
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] xsk: various CPU barrier and {READ, WRITE}_ONCE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux