Re: [PATCH] seccomp: fix compilation errors in seccomp-bpf kselftest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/22/19 3:58 PM, Alakesh Haloi wrote:
Without this patch we see following error while building and kselftest
for secccomp_bpf fails.

seccomp_bpf.c:1787:20: error: ‘PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY’ undeclared (first use in this function);
seccomp_bpf.c:1788:6: error: ‘PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT’ undeclared (first use in this function);

Signed-off-by: Alakesh Haloi <alakesh.haloi@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 8 ++++++++
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 6ef7f16c4cf5..2e619760fc3e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -1353,6 +1353,14 @@ TEST_F(precedence, log_is_fifth_in_any_order)
  #define PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP 7
  #endif
+#ifndef PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY
+#define PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY 1
+#endif
+
+#ifndef PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT
+#define PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT 2
+#endif
+
  #define IS_SECCOMP_EVENT(status) ((status >> 16) == PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP)
  bool tracer_running;
  void tracer_stop(int sig)


Hi Kees,

Okay to apply this one for 5.4-rc1. Or is this going through bpf tree?
If it is going through bpf tree:

Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

thanks,
-- Shuah



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux