Re: kernel/bpf/core.o: warning: objtool: ___bpf_prog_run.cold()+0x7: call without frame pointer save/setup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:43:27AM +0800, He Zhe wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/26/19 11:18 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:42:53PM +0800, He Zhe wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Since 3193c0836f20 ("bpf: Disable GCC -fgcse optimization for ___bpf_prog_run()"),
> >> We have got the following warning,
> >> kernel/bpf/core.o: warning: objtool: ___bpf_prog_run.cold()+0x7: call without frame pointer save/setup
> >>
> >> If reverting the above commit, we will get the following warning,
> >> kernel/bpf/core.o: warning: objtool: ___bpf_prog_run()+0x8b9: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
> >> if CONFIG_RETPOLINE=n, and no warning if CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y
> > Can you please share the following:
> >
> > - core.o file
> 
> Attached.
> 
> >
> > The following would also be helpful for me to try to recreate it:
> >
> > - config file
> > - compiler version
> > - kernel version
> 
> I pasted them in the other reply.

Thanks.  I was able to recreate.  I reduced it to:

void a(b);
__attribute__((optimize(""))) c(void) { a(); }

Apparently '__attribute__((optimize()))' is overwriting GCC cmdline
flags, including -fno-omit-frame-pointer.  I had assumed it would append
instead of replace.

I'm guessing this is a GCC "feature" instead of a bug.  I'll need to
follow up.

-- 
Josh



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux