Re: [PATCH] net: use unlikely for dql_avail case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: use unlikely for dql_avail case
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ast@xxxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kafai@xxxxxx, songliubraving@xxxxxx, yhs@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20190822065816.23619-1-xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn>

From: xiaolinkui <xiaolinkui@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:58:16 +0800

> This is an unlikely case, use unlikely() on it seems logical.
> 
> Signed-off-by: xiaolinkui <xiaolinkui@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to net-next.

References:
- [PATCH] net: use unlikely for dql_avail case
  - From: xiaolinkui

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 14/16] include/linux: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH v3] sock: fix potential memory leak in proto_register()
Previous by thread: [PATCH] net: use unlikely for dql_avail case
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] xsk: various CPU barrier and {READ, WRITE}_ONCE fixes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux