On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:25:29AM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote: > On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 10:59, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 09:28:26AM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote: > > > For future patches: Prefix AF_XDP socket work with "xsk:" and use "PATCH > > > bpf-next" to let the developers know what tree you're aiming for. > > > > There are over 300 trees in linux-next. It impossible to try remember > > everyone's trees. No one else has this requirement. > > > > Net/bpf are different, and I wanted to point that out to lessen the > burden for the maintainers. It's documented in: > > Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst. > Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst Ah... I hadn't realized that BPF patches were confusing to Dave. I actually do keep track of net and net-next. I do quite a bit of extra stuff for netdev patches. So what about if we used [PATCH] for bpf and [PATCH net] and [PATCH net-next] for networking? I will do that. regards, dan carpenter
