Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> [Tue, 2019-08-13 21:46 -0700]: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:28 PM Andrey Ignatov <rdna@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx> [Tue, 2019-08-13 16:24 -0700]: > > > Currently libbpf version is specified in 2 places: libbpf.map and > > > Makefile. They easily get out of sync and it's very easy to update one, > > > but forget to update another one. In addition, Github projection of > > > libbpf has to maintain its own version which has to be remembered to be > > > kept in sync manually, which is very error-prone approach. > > > > > > This patch makes libbpf.map a source of truth for libbpf version and > > > uses shell invocation to parse out correct full and major libbpf version > > > to use during build. Now we need to make sure that once new release > > > cycle starts, we need to add (initially) empty section to libbpf.map > > > with correct latest version. > > > > > > This also will make it possible to keep Github projection consistent > > > with kernel sources version of libbpf by adopting similar parsing of > > > version from libbpf.map. > > > > Thanks for taking care of this! > > > > > > > Cc: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@xxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx> > > > --- > > > tools/lib/bpf/Makefile | 12 +++++------- > > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 3 +++ > > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile b/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile > > > index 9312066a1ae3..d9afc8509725 100644 > > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile > > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile > > > @@ -1,9 +1,10 @@ > > > # SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause) > > > # Most of this file is copied from tools/lib/traceevent/Makefile > > > > > > -BPF_VERSION = 0 > > > -BPF_PATCHLEVEL = 0 > > > -BPF_EXTRAVERSION = 4 > > > +BPF_FULL_VERSION = $(shell \ > > > > Nit: Should it be LIBBPF_VERSION? IMO it's more descriptive name. > > LIBBPF_VERSION is used below, but combining your suggestion with > Jakub's eager evaluation, I can use just LIBBPF_VERSION and drop > BPF_FULL_VERSION altogether. > > > > > > + grep -E 'LIBBPF_([0-9]+)\.([0-9]+)\.([0-9]+) \{' libbpf.map | \ > > > + tail -n1 | cut -d'_' -f2 | cut -d' ' -f1) > > > > It can be done simpler and IMO versions should be sorted before taking > > the last one (just in case), something like: > > > > grep -oE '^LIBBPF_[0-9.]+' libbpf.map | cut -d_ -f 2 | sort -nr | head -n 1 > > Ah, you mean making regex simpler? Yeah, I originally intended to > extract major, patch, and extra version, but ralized patch and extra > are not used for anything. I'll simplify regex. But second `cut -d' ' > -f1` is still needed to drop " {". Yeah, regex, but not only. Note `-o' in the `grep' arguments, it returns only matched piece of a string and the second `cut' is not needed. > Regarding sorting. I don't think it's necessary, as I can't imagine > having non-ordered libbpf.map. Even more so, sort -nr doesn't sort > versions like these correctly anyway: > > 0.1.2 > 0.1.12 > > So this will just give us false sense of correctness, while being a "time bomb". Right, `-n' is not a good one, `-V' is much better since it's intended to sort specifically versions: % printf "0.1.2\n0.1.12\n0.1.11\n" 0.1.2 0.1.12 0.1.11 % printf "0.1.2\n0.1.12\n0.1.11\n" | sort -cV sort: -:3: disorder: 0.1.11 % printf "0.1.2\n0.1.12\n0.1.11\n" | sort -V 0.1.2 0.1.11 0.1.12 The reason I brought this up is the version string can be an arbitrary string and for example glibc does this: % grep -Eo '^\s+GLIBC_\S+' sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/Versions | tail -n 3 GLIBC_2.29 GLIBC_2.30 GLIBC_PRIVATE I agree though that it's not a problem with the current version script structure and it should be fine to postpone adding some kind of sorting till the time this structure is changed (if at all). > > > +BPF_VERSION = $(firstword $(subst ., ,$(BPF_FULL_VERSION))) > > > > > > MAKEFLAGS += --no-print-directory > > > > > > @@ -79,15 +80,12 @@ export prefix libdir src obj > > > libdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(libdir)) > > > libdir_relative_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(libdir_relative)) > > > > > > +LIBBPF_VERSION = $(BPF_FULL_VERSION) > > > VERSION = $(BPF_VERSION) > > > -PATCHLEVEL = $(BPF_PATCHLEVEL) > > > -EXTRAVERSION = $(BPF_EXTRAVERSION) > > > > > > OBJ = $@ > > > N = > > > > > > -LIBBPF_VERSION = $(BPF_VERSION).$(BPF_PATCHLEVEL).$(BPF_EXTRAVERSION) > > > - > > > LIB_TARGET = libbpf.a libbpf.so.$(LIBBPF_VERSION) > > > LIB_FILE = libbpf.a libbpf.so* > > > PC_FILE = libbpf.pc > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map > > > index f9d316e873d8..4e72df8e98ba 100644 > > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map > > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map > > > @@ -184,3 +184,6 @@ LIBBPF_0.0.4 { > > > perf_buffer__new_raw; > > > perf_buffer__poll; > > > } LIBBPF_0.0.3; > > > + > > > +LIBBPF_0.0.5 { > > > +} LIBBPF_0.0.4; > > > > I'm not sure version should be bumped in this patch since this patch is > > about keeping the version in one place, not about bumping it, right? > > This is actually fixing a version. Current libbpf version in bpf-next > is 0.0.5, it just was never updated in Makefile. > > > > > > > > -- > > > 2.17.1 > > > > > > > -- > > Andrey Ignatov -- Andrey Ignatov