On 8/12/19 5:30 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
Hello Daniel and Alexei, We would like to send s390 eBPF JIT patches through your bpf tree (as opposed to our s390 tree), since even though they mostly deal with s390 instruction set, we believe you might spot more potential issues than we do. We also hope that this would allow to identify potential conflicts with generic bpf changes earlier. Would that be OK?
Sounds good, this also aligns with pretty much all other JITs that patches are routed via bpf/bpf-next. Thanks, Daniel
