On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:20 PM Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 24, 2019, at 5:37 PM, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 5:00 PM Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Jul 24, 2019, at 12:27 PM, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> Add support for BPF CO-RE offset relocations. Add section/record > >>> iteration macros for .BTF.ext. These macro are useful for iterating over > >>> each .BTF.ext record, either for dumping out contents or later for BPF > >>> CO-RE relocation handling. > >>> > >>> To enable other parts of libbpf to work with .BTF.ext contents, moved > >>> a bunch of type definitions into libbpf_internal.h. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx> > >>> --- > >>> tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 64 +++++++++-------------- > >>> tools/lib/bpf/btf.h | 4 ++ > >>> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> 3 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) > >>> > > > > [...] > > > >>> + > >>> static int btf_ext_parse_hdr(__u8 *data, __u32 data_size) > >>> { > >>> const struct btf_ext_header *hdr = (struct btf_ext_header *)data; > >>> @@ -1004,6 +979,13 @@ struct btf_ext *btf_ext__new(__u8 *data, __u32 size) > >>> if (err) > >>> goto done; > >>> > >>> + /* check if there is offset_reloc_off/offset_reloc_len fields */ > >>> + if (btf_ext->hdr->hdr_len < sizeof(struct btf_ext_header)) > >> > >> This check will break when we add more optional sections to btf_ext_header. > >> Maybe use offsetof() instead? > > > > I didn't do it, because there are no fields after offset_reloc_len. > > But now I though that maybe it would be ok to add zero-sized marker > > field, kind of like marking off various versions of btf_ext header? > > > > Alternatively, I can add offsetofend() macro somewhere in libbpf_internal.h. > > > > Do you have any preference? > > We only need a stable number to compare against. offsetofend() works. > Or we can simply have something like > > if (btf_ext->hdr->hdr_len <= offsetof(struct btf_ext_header, offset_reloc_off)) > goto done; > or > if (btf_ext->hdr->hdr_len < offsetof(struct btf_ext_header, offset_reloc_len)) > goto done; > > Does this make sense? I think offsetofend() is the cleanest solution, I'll do just that. > > Thanks, > Song