Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/gup: introduce __put_user_pages()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 03:34:13PM -0700, john.hubbard@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> +enum pup_flags_t {
> +	PUP_FLAGS_CLEAN		= 0,
> +	PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY		= 1,
> +	PUP_FLAGS_LOCK		= 2,
> +	PUP_FLAGS_DIRTY_LOCK	= 3,
> +};

Well, the enum defeats the ease of just being able to pass a boolean
expression to the function, which would simplify a lot of the caller,
so if we need to support the !locked version I'd rather see that as
a separate helper.

But do we actually have callers where not using the _lock version is
not a bug?  set_page_dirty makes sense in the context of a file systems
that have a reference to the inode the page hangs off, but that is
(almost?) never the case for get_user_pages.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux