Thank you for the reviews!
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 4:56 AM Lorenz Bauer <lmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 08:59, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP || sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (!sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_syncookies)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (!th->syn || th->ack || th->fin || th->rst)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + switch (sk->sk_family) {
> >
> > This is strange, because a dual stack listener will have sk->sk_family set to AF_INET6.
> >
> > What really matters here is if the packet is IPv4 or IPv6.
> >
> > So you need to look at iph->version instead.
> >
> > Then look if the socket family allows this packet to be processed
> > (For example AF_INET6 sockets might prevent IPv4 packets, see sk->sk_ipv6only )
This makes a lot of sense, thanks Eric, will update!
>
> Does this apply for (the existing) tcp_check_syn_cookie as well?
I think we will probably have to update the check there, too.
>
> --
> Lorenz Bauer | Systems Engineer
> 6th Floor, County Hall/The Riverside Building, SE1 7PB, UK
>
> www.cloudflare.com
