On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:59 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> perf_buffer test fails for exactly the same reason test_attach_probe
> used to fail: different nanosleep syscall kprobe name.
>
> Reuse the test_attach_probe fix.
>
> Fixes: ee5cf82ce04a ("selftests/bpf: test perf buffer API")
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Thanks for the fix!
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>
> .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c | 12 ++----------
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c | 8 +-------
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> index 47af4afc5013..5ecc267d98b0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c
> @@ -21,14 +21,6 @@ ssize_t get_base_addr() {
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> -#ifdef __x86_64__
> -#define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep"
> -#elif defined(__s390x__)
> -#define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "__s390x_sys_nanosleep"
> -#else
> -#define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep"
> -#endif
> -
> void test_attach_probe(void)
> {
> const char *kprobe_name = "kprobe/sys_nanosleep";
> @@ -86,7 +78,7 @@ void test_attach_probe(void)
>
> kprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe(kprobe_prog,
> false /* retprobe */,
> - SYS_KPROBE_NAME);
> + SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME);
> if (CHECK(IS_ERR(kprobe_link), "attach_kprobe",
> "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(kprobe_link))) {
> kprobe_link = NULL;
> @@ -94,7 +86,7 @@ void test_attach_probe(void)
> }
> kretprobe_link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe(kretprobe_prog,
> true /* retprobe */,
> - SYS_KPROBE_NAME);
> + SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME);
> if (CHECK(IS_ERR(kretprobe_link), "attach_kretprobe",
> "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(kretprobe_link))) {
> kretprobe_link = NULL;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
> index 3f1ef95865ff..3003fddc0613 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
> @@ -5,12 +5,6 @@
> #include <sys/socket.h>
> #include <test_progs.h>
>
> -#ifdef __x86_64__
> -#define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep"
> -#else
> -#define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep"
> -#endif
> -
> static void on_sample(void *ctx, int cpu, void *data, __u32 size)
> {
> int cpu_data = *(int *)data, duration = 0;
> @@ -56,7 +50,7 @@ void test_perf_buffer(void)
>
> /* attach kprobe */
> link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe(prog, false /* retprobe */,
> - SYS_KPROBE_NAME);
> + SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME);
> if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "attach_kprobe", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(link)))
> goto out_close;
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> index f095e1d4c657..49e0f7d85643 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> @@ -92,3 +92,11 @@ int compare_map_keys(int map1_fd, int map2_fd);
> int compare_stack_ips(int smap_fd, int amap_fd, int stack_trace_len);
> int extract_build_id(char *build_id, size_t size);
> void *spin_lock_thread(void *arg);
> +
> +#ifdef __x86_64__
> +#define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep"
> +#elif defined(__s390x__)
> +#define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__s390x_sys_nanosleep"
> +#else
> +#define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep"
> +#endif
> --
> 2.21.0
>
