[PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/3] fix BTF verification size resolution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



BTF size resolution logic isn't always resolving type size correctly, leading
to erroneous map creation failures due to value size mismatch.

This patch set:
1. fixes the issue (patch #1);
2. adds tests for trickier cases (patch #2);
3. and converts few test cases utilizing BTF-defined maps, that previously
   couldn't use typedef'ed arrays due to kernel bug (patch #3).

Patch #1 can be applied against bpf tree, but selftest ones (#2 and #3) have
to go against bpf-next for now.

Andrii Nakryiko (3):
  bpf: fix BTF verifier size resolution logic
  selftests/bpf: add trickier size resolution tests
  selftests/bpf: use typedef'ed arrays as map values

 kernel/bpf/btf.c                              | 14 ++-
 .../bpf/progs/test_get_stack_rawtp.c          |  3 +-
 .../bpf/progs/test_stacktrace_build_id.c      |  3 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_stacktrace_map.c |  2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c        | 88 +++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux