Re: [PATCH V2 0/1] tools/dtrace: initial implementation of DTrace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/1] tools/dtrace: initial implementation of DTrace
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 15:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dtrace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx, acme@xxxxxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, clm@xxxxxx
In-reply-to: <201907101537.x6AFboMR015946@aserv0122.oracle.com>

From: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:37:50 -0700 (PDT)

> This is version 2 of the patch, incorporating feedback from Peter
> Zijlstra and Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo.

No way, NACK.

References:
- [PATCH V2 0/1] tools/dtrace: initial implementation of DTrace
  - From: Kris Van Hees

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH V2 1/1 (was 0/1 by accident)] tools/dtrace: initial implementation of DTrace
Next by Date: Re: [RESEND] test_verifier #13 fails on arm64: "retval 65507 != -29"
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH V2 1/1 (was 0/1 by accident)] tools/dtrace: initial implementation of DTrace
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/2] bpf: Allow bpf_skb_event_output for more prog types
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux