Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix "alu with different scalars 1" on s390

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 1:52 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> BPF_LDX_MEM is used to load the least significant byte of the retrieved
> test_val.index, however, on big-endian machines it ends up retrieving
> the most significant byte.
>
> Use the correct least significant byte offset on big-endian machines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>

> ---
>
> v1->v2:
> - use __BYTE_ORDER instead of __BYTE_ORDER__.
>
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c
> index c3de1a2c9dc5..e5940c4e8b8f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c
> @@ -183,7 +183,11 @@
>         BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
>         BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
>         BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> +#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
>         BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
> +#else
> +       BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, sizeof(int) - 1),
> +#endif
>         BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 3),
>         BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
>         BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0x100000),
> --
> 2.21.0
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux