On 25.06.19 09:42:14, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 04:58:10PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > From peterz's comments, the patches, it's not obvious to me how one is
> > to choose between 0 (NOTIFY_DONE) and 1 (NOTIFY_OK) in the case of a
> > routine success.
>
> I'm not sure either; what I think I choice was:
>
> - if I want to completely ignore the callback, use DONE (per the
> "Don't care" comment).
>
> - if we finished the notifier without error, use OK or
> notifier_from_errno(0).
>
> But yes, its a bit of a shit interface.
It looks like it was rarely used in earlier kernels as some sort of
error detection for the notifier calls, e.g.:
1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2:kernel/profile.c-int profile_handoff_task(struct task_struct * task)
1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2:kernel/profile.c-{
1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2:kernel/profile.c- int ret;
1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2:kernel/profile.c- read_lock(&handoff_lock);
1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2:kernel/profile.c- ret = notifier_call_chain(&task_free_notifier, 0, task);
1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2:kernel/profile.c- read_unlock(&handoff_lock);
1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2:kernel/profile.c: return (ret == NOTIFY_OK) ? 1 : 0;
1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2:kernel/profile.c-}
So NOTIFY_OK was used to state there is no error, while NOTIFY_DONE
says the notifier was executed and there might have been errors. The
caller may distinguish the results then.
-Robert
