Commit 2589726d12a1 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") caused a change in the way some registers liveliness is reported in the test_align. Add missing "_w" to a couple of tests. Note, there are no offset changes! Fixes: 2589726d12a1 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c index 3c789d03b629..0262f7b374f9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .matches = { - {7, "R0=pkt(id=0,off=8,r=8,imm=0)"}, + {7, "R0_w=pkt(id=0,off=8,r=8,imm=0)"}, {7, "R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, {8, "R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=510,var_off=(0x0; 0x1fe))"}, {9, "R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { /* Calculated offset in R6 has unknown value, but known * alignment of 4. */ - {8, "R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, + {8, "R2_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, {8, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* Offset is added to packet pointer R5, resulting in * known fixed offset, and variable offset from R6. @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { /* Calculated offset in R6 has unknown value, but known * alignment of 4. */ - {8, "R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, + {8, "R2_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, {8, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* Adding 14 makes R6 be (4n+2) */ {9, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"}, @@ -473,12 +473,12 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { /* (4n) + 14 == (4n+2). We blow our bounds, because * the add could overflow. */ - {7, "R5=inv(id=0,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, + {7, "R5_w=inv(id=0,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, /* Checked s>=0 */ {9, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, /* packet pointer + nonnegative (4n+2) */ {11, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, - {13, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, + {13, "R4_w=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, /* NET_IP_ALIGN + (4n+2) == (4n), alignment is fine. * We checked the bounds, but it might have been able * to overflow if the packet pointer started in the @@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { * So we did not get a 'range' on R6, and the access * attempt will fail. */ - {15, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, + {15, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, } }, { @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { /* Calculated offset in R6 has unknown value, but known * alignment of 4. */ - {7, "R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, + {7, "R2_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, {9, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* Adding 14 makes R6 be (4n+2) */ {10, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"}, @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { /* Calculated offset in R6 has unknown value, but known * alignment of 4. */ - {7, "R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, + {7, "R2_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, {10, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=60,var_off=(0x0; 0x3c))"}, /* Adding 14 makes R6 be (4n+2) */ {11, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=74,var_off=(0x2; 0x7c))"}, -- 2.22.0.410.gd8fdbe21b5-goog