On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 11:39:27 -0700, Y Song wrote: > By default, we have > # define __always_inline inline __attribute__((always_inline)) > > So just use __always_inline should be less verbose in your patch. I'll resubmit, converting everything to __always_inline, targeting bpf-next. > BTW, what compiler did you use have this behavior? clang version 7.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_701/final) LLVM version 7.0.1 > Did you have issues with `static __attribute__((always_inline))`? That seems to work, too. Jiri
