Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: do not ignore clang failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 1:56 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Am 28.06.2019 um 22:35 schrieb Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:15 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> >> index f2dbe2043067..2316fa2d5b3b 100644
> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> >> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> >> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >>
> >> +SHELL := /bin/bash
> >
> > I am not sure whether it is ok to require bash. I don't see such requirements in
> > other Makefile's under tools/.
> >
> > Can we enable some fall back when bash is not present?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Song
>
> I think checking for bash presence would unnecessarily complicate
> things.  What do you think about having separate targets for
> clang-generated bitcode?

Do we still need clang | llc pipeline with new clang? Could the same
be achieved with single clang invocation? That would solve the problem
of not detecting pipeline failures.

But either way, I think .DELETE_ON_ERROR is worth adding nevertheless.

>
> Best regards,
> Ilya



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux