On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:02 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Notice that in this case, it's much clearer to explicitly add a break > rather than letting the code to fall through. It also avoid potential > future fall-through warnings[1]. > > This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable > -Wimplicit-fallthrough. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1087056/ > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> this type of changes are not suitable for bpf tree. Pls submit both as single patch to bpf-next
