[PATCH][bpf-next] bpf: verifier: add a break statement in switch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Notice that in this case, it's much clearer to explicitly add a break
rather than letting the code to fall through. It also avoid potential
future fall-through warnings[1].

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1087056/

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 709ce4cef8ba..0b38cc917d21 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6066,6 +6066,7 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			range = tnum_range(0, 3);
 			enforce_attach_type_range = tnum_range(2, 3);
 		}
+		break;
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK:
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR:
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS:
-- 
2.21.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux