ibumad example was implementing the bpf_debug macro which is exactly the
same as the bpf_printk macro available in bpf_helpers.h. This change
makes use of bpf_printk instead of bpf_debug.
Signed-off-by: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
samples/bpf/ibumad_kern.c | 18 ++++++------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/samples/bpf/ibumad_kern.c b/samples/bpf/ibumad_kern.c
index 38b2b3f22049..f281df7e0089 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/ibumad_kern.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/ibumad_kern.c
@@ -31,15 +31,9 @@ struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") write_count = {
};
#undef DEBUG
-#ifdef DEBUG
-#define bpf_debug(fmt, ...) \
-({ \
- char ____fmt[] = fmt; \
- bpf_trace_printk(____fmt, sizeof(____fmt), \
- ##__VA_ARGS__); \
-})
-#else
-#define bpf_debug(fmt, ...)
+#ifndef DEBUG
+#undef bpf_printk
+#define bpf_printk(fmt, ...)
#endif
/* Taken from the current format defined in
@@ -86,7 +80,7 @@ int on_ib_umad_read_recv(struct ib_umad_rw_args *ctx)
u64 zero = 0, *val;
u8 class = ctx->mgmt_class;
- bpf_debug("ib_umad read recv : class 0x%x\n", class);
+ bpf_printk("ib_umad read recv : class 0x%x\n", class);
val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&read_count, &class);
if (!val) {
@@ -106,7 +100,7 @@ int on_ib_umad_read_send(struct ib_umad_rw_args *ctx)
u64 zero = 0, *val;
u8 class = ctx->mgmt_class;
- bpf_debug("ib_umad read send : class 0x%x\n", class);
+ bpf_printk("ib_umad read send : class 0x%x\n", class);
val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&read_count, &class);
if (!val) {
@@ -126,7 +120,7 @@ int on_ib_umad_write(struct ib_umad_rw_args *ctx)
u64 zero = 0, *val;
u8 class = ctx->mgmt_class;
- bpf_debug("ib_umad write : class 0x%x\n", class);
+ bpf_printk("ib_umad write : class 0x%x\n", class);
val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&write_count, &class);
if (!val) {
--
2.21.0
