Re: [PATCH] bpf: hide do_bpf_send_signal when unused

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: hide do_bpf_send_signal when unused
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 08:26:29 -0700
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>, Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>, Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>, Matt Mullins <mmullins@xxxxxx>, Network Development <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20190617125724.1616165-1-arnd@arndb.de>

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 5:59 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> When CONFIG_MODULES is disabled, this function is never called:
>
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:581:13: error: 'do_bpf_send_signal' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]

hmm. it should work just fine without modules.
the bug is somewhere else.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] bpf: hide do_bpf_send_signal when unused
  - From: Steven Rostedt

References:
- [PATCH] bpf: hide do_bpf_send_signal when unused
  - From: Arnd Bergmann

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf trace: Use pr_debug() instead of fprintf() for logging
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/9] bpf: bounded loops and other features
Previous by thread: [PATCH] bpf: hide do_bpf_send_signal when unused
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] bpf: hide do_bpf_send_signal when unused
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux