On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:36 PM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Force the minimum number of locks to two.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Arthur Fabre <afabre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Fixes: 6ac99e8f23d4 ("bpf: Introduce bpf sk local storage")
>
> The offending commit is already in Linus tree hence if so bpf tree. Arthur, please
> elaborate why bpf-next is targeted specifically here?
It's certainly should be in bpf tree.
It didn't apply directly, so I tweaked it a tiny bit,
reduced verbosity of commit log and pushed to bpf tree.
Thanks for the fix!
