Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: doc: update answer for 32-bit subregister question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 1:42 PM Song Liu <liu.song.a23@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 1:23 PM Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > There has been quite a few progress around the two steps mentioned in the
> > answer to the following question:
> >
> >   Q: BPF 32-bit subregister requirements
> >
> > This patch updates the answer to reflect what has been done.
> >
> > v2:
> >  - Add missing full stop. (Song Liu)
> >  - Minor tweak on one sentence. (Song Liu)
> >
> > v1:
> >  - Integrated rephrase from Quentin and Jakub
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>

Applied. Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux