On 05/29/2019 11:57 AM, Jiong Wang wrote: > JIT back-ends need to guarantee high 32-bit cleared whenever one eBPF insn > write low 32-bit sub-register only. It is possible that some JIT back-ends > have failed doing this and are silently generating wrong image. > > This set completes the unit tests, so bug on this could be exposed. > > Jiong Wang (2): > selftests: bpf: move sub-register zero extension checks into subreg.c > selftests: bpf: complete sub-register zero extension checks > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic_instr.c | 39 -- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/subreg.c | 533 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 533 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/subreg.c Looks good, thanks for following up! Applied, thanks!
