Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, 22 May 2019 22:54:44 +0200, Björn Töpel wrote: >> > > Now, the same commands give: >> > > >> > > # ip link set dev eth0 xdp obj foo.o sec main >> > > # ip link set dev eth0 xdpgeneric off >> > > Error: native and generic XDP can't be active at the same time. >> > >> > I'm not clear why this change is necessary? It is a change in >> > behaviour, and if anything returning ENOENT would seem cleaner >> > in this case. >> >> To me, the existing behavior was non-intuitive. If most people *don't* >> agree, I'll remove this change. So, what do people think about this? >> :-) > > Having things start to fail after they were successful/ignored > is one of those ABI breakage types Linux and netdev usually takes > pretty seriously, unfortunately. Especially when motivation is > "it's more intuitive" :) > > If nobody chimes in please break out this behaviour change into > a commit of its own. Björn and I already had this discussion off-list. I think we ended up concluding that since it's not changing kernel *behaviour*, but just making an existing error explicit, it might be acceptable from an ABI breakage PoV. And I'd generally prefer explicit errors over silent failures. But yeah, can totally see why it could also be considered a breaking change... -Toke
