Re: [PATCH 0/9] eBPF support for GNU binutils

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/05/2019 20:34, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>     On 21/05/2019 19:18, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>     > I think Ed had an idea on how to specify BTF in asm syntax.
>     Specifically, see [1] for BTF as implemented in ebpf_asm, though note
>     that it doesn't (yet) cover .btf.ext or lineinfo.
>     
>     [1]: https://github.com/solarflarecom/ebpf_asm/tree/btfdoc#type-definitions
>
> Thanks for the reference.  I just checked out your `btfdoc' branch.  I
> will take a look.
>
> Where would you like to get feedback/suggestions/questions btw?
For ebpf_asm?  Either through GitHub Issues, or this address (ecree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx).

I'm not actually on bpf@vger (though maybe I ought to subscribe...)

BTW I'm really happy to see someone working on eBPF support in the GNU
 toolchain; being tied to an LLVM monoculture has been bad for eBPF imho.

-Ed



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux