Re: [PATCH v8 perf,bpf 00/15] perf annotation of BPF programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Mar 11, 2019, at 2:05 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Em Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:01:48PM +0000, Song Liu escreveu:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 11, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Em Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:55:40PM -0700, Song Liu escreveu:
>>>> ===================== Note on patch dependency  ========================
>>>> This set has dependency in both bpf-next tree and tip/perf/core. Current
>>>> version is developed on bpf-next tree with the following commits
>>>> cherry-picked from tip/perf/core (or acme/perf/core):
>>>> 
>>>> (from 1/11 to 11/11)
>>>> commit 76193a94522f ("perf, bpf: Introduce PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL")
>>>> commit d764ac646491 ("tools headers uapi: Sync tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h")
>>>> commit 6ee52e2a3fe4 ("perf, bpf: Introduce PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT")
>>>> commit df063c83aa2c ("tools headers uapi: Sync tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h")
>>>> commit 9aa0bfa370b2 ("perf tools: Handle PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL")
>>>> commit 45178a928a4b ("perf tools: Handle PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT")
>>>> commit 7b612e291a5a ("perf tools: Synthesize PERF_RECORD_* for loaded BPF programs")
>>>> commit a40b95bcd30c ("perf top: Synthesize BPF events for pre-existing loaded BPF programs")
>>>> commit 6934058d9fb6 ("bpf: Add module name [bpf] to ksymbols for bpf programs")
>>>> commit 811184fb6977 ("perf bpf: Fix synthesized PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL/BPF_EVENT")
>>>> comimt 94816add0005 ("perf tools: Add perf_exe() helper to find perf binary")
>>>> ========================================================================
>>> 
>>> These csets are already upstream, i.e. already hit torvalds/master, i.e.
>>> will be in 5.1, can you check that we still need doing this
>>> cherry-picking?
>>> 
>>> - Arnaldo
>> 
>> I just checked that 02-15 of the set could apply to torvalds/master (with 
>> some minor conflicts), and it works as expected. 
> 
> So no need to cherrypick, just use torvalds/master as a base, ok.
> 
> - Arnaldo

Do you want me to resend the set with the conflict resolved? 

Thanks,
Song



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux