On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 09:08:53PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > Non-zero imm value in the second part of the ldimm64 instruction for > BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD is invalid, and thus must be rejected. The map fd > only ever sits in the first instructions' imm field. None of the BPF > loaders known to us are using it, so risk of regression is minimal. > For clarity and consistency, the few insn->{src_reg,imm} occurrences > are rewritten into insn[0].{src_reg,imm}. Add a test case to the BPF > selftest suite as well. > > Fixes: 0246e64d9a5f ("bpf: handle pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 insn") > Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied, Thanks