On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 07:42:12PM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Recently we had linux-next bpf/bpf-next conflict when we added new
> functionality to the test_progs.c at the same location. Let's split
> test_progs.c the same way we recently split test_verifier.c.
>
> I follow the same patten we did in commit 2dfb40121ee8 ("selftests: bpf:
> prepare for break up of verifier tests") for verifier: create
> scaffolding to support dedicated files and slowly move the tests into
> separate files.
>
> The first patch adds scaffolding, subsequent patches move progs into
> separate files.
>
> In theory, many of the standalone tests can be migrated to this new
> framework as well. They get the benefit of common CHECK macro and
> bpf_find_map function which a lot of standalone tests need to redefine.
>
> v3 changes:
> * respin on top of commit ebace0e981b2 ("selftests/bpf: use
> __bpf_constant_htons in test_prog.c for flow dissector")
> * put bpf_rlimit.h into test_progs.c instead of test_progs.h
>
> v2 changes:
> * added cover letter, added more description about file structure
Applied, Thanks
