On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:49:46 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > Overall, BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_VALUE felt slightly more suitable to me. FWIW +1 I think different type is way cleaner here.
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 10:49:46 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > Overall, BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_VALUE felt slightly more suitable to me. FWIW +1 I think different type is way cleaner here.