My issue with Alpine though is it's losing my IMAP mails, like I've
several with attachments that Alpine skips right over and Mutt displays
fine however, so I'm not sure if that's a problem with Alpine? My Gmail
terminal setup works fine in Mutt however, which is doubly weird
Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
If you want to use an email client with Orca, stick to Thunderbird.
I find Orca unwieldy in the terminal anyway.
If, however, you wish to do so with Speakup or Fenrir, I personally
prefer Alpine.
Why? Simple. I don't know Mutt at all.
Warm regards,
Brandt Steenkamp
Sent from the Slint console using Alpine
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 16:00:22 +0000
From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Mutt or Alpine
So I'm using Mutt, but...
What does Mutt have over Alpine and vice versa, why would I use one
over the other?
Mutt seems faster to me, but Alpine seems more user friendly without
making temporary files while composing a message (unles I can tell
Mutt/Neomutt to delete those automatically
So is there a consensus of which is the easier choice to use with Orca?
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list