I'd agree it's not an optimal solution, and I'm unaware whether there's a better configuration option available with mailman; however, it is intentional and was put in place to solve a problem we encountered a few years ago. Now, having said this much, I regret I don't remember the particulars of the problem we were solving at the time. I only remember that the current behavior solved the issue. Perhaps someone else on list may have better recall of the problem back then? I recall only that it was a big deal for some reason. Best, Janina Linux for blind general discussion writes: > > On Jun 14, 2020, at 13:23, Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > What is a ‘settings issue’? > > Are you meaning a problem with settings? > > Yes. On all of my other mailing lists, the identity of the sender is given in the From line. In some cases, the email address is obfuscated, but I still know who sent the message. In this list, all of the From lines say "On ..., Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:". I find this confusing, because I can't tell who's saying what (unless they happen to end their post with a signature). > > If this mailing list behavior is intentional, please let me know and I'll live with it. If it isn't, perhaps the settings on the mailing list need to be modified. > > -r > > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Janina Sajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa _______________________________________________ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list