granted the most important question here, is for whom?
There are as many ways to accommodate as there are *individuals*
managing the experience.
Cannot speak to our first combination as I cannot use that one physically.
However if properly compiled both E-links and links manage html5 and
javascripting.
Likewise depending on your definition of javascripting, some editions of
lynx have html5 plug ins and can manage some JavaScript submit buttons, at
least the most recent can.
Cheers,
Karen
On Sun, 27 Jan 2019, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
Hi,
Is Orca + Firefox going to yield the most accessible web browsing experience
nowadays? Is there such a thing as a good text-based browser alternative
these days that is capable of handling HTML5, javascript etc? I suspect not,
but it can't hurt to ask.
I also heard that Mate is more accessible than GNOME. What do people find
problematic or inaccessible with GNOME as compared to Mate?
Thanks,
Tobias
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list